On Sunday, April 22, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Zhou, Sifan wrote:
Thank you, Ariel.I was referring to "cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata"(by Matthew Blackwell et.al, The Stata Journal 2009), in which iweight is used usually and aweight is used when we have multiple imputation. Or has that been changed since 2009? If so, could you please kindly offer me a reference? I hope I can find out how these weights are used in estimations.And I did find two weighting method behave differently. For the same cem_weights, using pweight or iweight gives different results. I will also try aweight.Sifan
________________________________________Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 4:42 PMTo: Zhou, Sifan; cem-bounces@lists.gking.harvard.edu; cem@lists.gking.harvard.eduSubject: Re: [cem] how to incorporate sampling weight with cem_weights?
I believe an "aweight" is used for cem_weight in Stata, not "iweight". I think the product of the sampling weight and cem_weight should suffice, assuming the aweight and pweight don't behave differently...
Ariel
-----Original Message-----From: "Zhou, Sifan" <szhou@albany.edu>Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:20:20Subject: [cem] how to incorporate sampling weight with cem_weights?
---cem Mailing List, served by HUITSend messages: cem@lists.gking.harvard.edu[un]subscribe Options: http://lists.gking.harvard.edu/?info=cemMore information on cem: http://gking.harvard.edu/cemCem mailing list---cem Mailing List, served by HUITSend messages: cem@lists.gking.harvard.edu[un]subscribe Options: http://lists.gking.harvard.edu/?info=cemMore information on cem: http://gking.harvard.edu/cemCem mailing list