6 Jan
2011
6 Jan
'11
11:31 a.m.
Sure, matching just preprocesses the data. After that you can use whatever
method you deem appropriate and the results will be less model dependent
(for sure with CEM, and often with other methods).
Gary
--
*Gary King* - Albert J. Weatherhead III University Professor - Director,
IQSS - Harvard University
GKing.Harvard.edu <http://gking.harvard.edu/> - King(a)Harvard.edu -
@kinggary<http://twitter.com/kinggary>- 617-500-7570 - Asst 495-9271 -
Fax 812-8581
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Prashant <presearchwork(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
Is it generally okay to use quantile regression after cem (or matching
in general)?
best wishes,
Prashant
-
cem Mailing List, served by Harvard-MIT Data Center
Send messages: cem(a)lists.gking.harvard.edu
[un]subscribe Options: http://lists.gking.harvard.edu/?info=cem
More information on cem: http://gking.harvard.edu/cem