On Mon, 8 May 2006, Dennis Feehan wrote:
Hi all,
Here's our (untimely) abstract. Any comments would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Dennis & Jeremy
How Healthy Are We? A disadvantage to using ranked data for health state
valuation
the disadvantage of ranked data for ....
Health state valuations (HSVs) constitute a fundamental building block for
measuring health system performance. To obtain HSVs, investigators often ask
respondents to value levels of disability using the time trade-off (TTO)
method. This procedure is costly, time-consuming, and difficult to
implement. Salomon (2003) proposes a model that estimates HSVs using only
ranked data, tests it with the 1993 British General Public Survey, and finds
the results nearly identical to a TTO-based model. We extend Salomon (2003)
by allowing HSVs to vary according to individual characteristics like age
and marital status, but find that some quantities of interest cannot be
estimated with the rank data. Our results show one limitation to using
ordinal data to measure cardinal quantities.
so the structure of this is clear:
1. important question, but difficult to measure
2. Salomon shows an easy to measure method works as well.
3. you show that that method doesn't cover something else we're interseted
in.
so the fact of a contribution is clear. it would also be good to clarify
what the contribution is. i.e,. i'm not clear on what you mean by
anything after the word 'but' in the antipenultimate line.
gary
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l