Hey folks, Just got some feedback from the Dataverse team that some of you are releasing replication archives without completely cataloging what's going on (e.g., no abstracts, etc.). So, just a friendly request to be comprehensive in your cataloging. It helps the staff and it also helps future scholars find your work down the road. Maya

Hi Maya, as a follow up to your last email, we were wondering if you could suggest us what is the formal (or usual) way to cite/refer to dataverse in our paper. Thank you. Best, Chiara On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Maya Sen wrote: Along these lines, I've just checked the status of submissions, and not too many of you have submitted your replication archives. Be sure to give yourselves enough time to do this, as you'll need to cite to this in your replication paper! Maya On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Maya Sen <msen at fas.harvard.edu> wrote: _______________________________________________ gov2001-l mailing list gov2001-l at lists.fas.harvard.edu http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l _______________________________________________ gov2001-l mailing list gov2001-l at lists.fas.harvard.edu http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l