Thanks for asking, Wei.
Let high growth be the 75th percentile and low growth be the 25th
percentile.
Olivia
----- Original Message -----
From: "weiha" <weiha(a)fas.harvard.edu>
To: <gov2001-l(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [gov2001-l] For this week's problem set
What about 0 and -1? What does that mean?
Plus, how to define 'High Growth' and 'Low Growth'?
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Wei Ha PhD Candidate in Public Policy Harvard University Phone: (617)
384-1450
Fax: 1-801-605-1455
----- Original Message -----
From: "Olivia Lau" <olau(a)fas.harvard.edu>
To: <gov2001-l(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [gov2001-l] For this week's problem set
Democratic incumbent is coded as a 1.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kentaro Fukumoto" <fukumoto(a)dg8.so-net.ne.jp>
To: <gov2001-l(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [gov2001-l] For this week's problem set
> Good evening all,
>
> As for PS 7,
>> For 2, use PRESINC as the incumbency variable. Do *not* include INC
>> in the regression.
>
> I still wonder.
> #2(c)(1), (1)and (3) require us to consider the scenarios of incumbent
> Democrat candidate running.
> camp.txt just says "PRESINC Elected Incumbent Seeking Reelection."
> But how do we know incumbents are Democrats or not?
>
> Kentaro
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gov2001-l mailing list
> gov2001-l(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
>
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
>
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu