the main thing you should turn in is a memo from you to the author (your
classmate) whose work you're (re)analyzing. the point of the memo is to
detail as many ways as possible to improve their work. Put the big points
first, but include the details too. The replication of their replication
should be pretty straightforward (if not explain why), and so that will
leave most of your time available for finding ways of pushing forward
and improving their analyses with different models, specifications, etc.
if you can run things, do so; if you can't for some subset of the
analyses, you can still make suggestions...
Gary
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Allan Friedman wrote:
On monday, should we turn in a replicated copy of the
replicated
tables? And the code that we used to produce them? Anything else?
/\llan
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l