Yeah, actually all this confusion was due to a typo in my code. Sorry
was wasting everyone's time.
Jon
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Colin Brown <brown4 at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
They won't be *precisely* equivalent unless you
set the same seed before
each time you run the command. Otherwise Zelig is running different
simulations for each output.
-Colin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jens Hainmueller" <jhainmueller at gmail.com>
To: <gov2001-l at lists.fas.harvard.edu>
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [gov2001-l] 1b
The FDs should be similar to the difference
between the EVs in both states
of the world (x.low and x.high), otherwise something is fishy.
-----Original Message-----
From: gov2001-l-bounces at
lists.fas.harvard.edu [mailto:gov2001-l-
bounces at
lists.fas.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Jon Bischof
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 8:33 PM
To: gov2001-l at
lists.fas.harvard.edu
Subject: [gov2001-l] 1b
In part 1b, the Zelig output for first differences bears no
resemblance to the difference in the expected values. Anyone have an
idea why this would be the case? I thought the FD process was just to
give us a standard error for the difference between the expected
values.
--
Jon Bischof
Graduate Student
Department of Government
Harvard University
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l at
lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l at
lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l at
lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
--
Jon Bischof
Graduate Student
Department of Government
Harvard University