this is very clear. doesn't sound like you have a big result of course,
but that's how research happens sometimes!
i'd drop 'innate' which you have no evidence about. i think you mean
immovable or unfixable or something like that. i'm not sure i understand
your last sentence. if it means you have a separate finding, you might
rewrite the entire abstract to focus on that.
Gary
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, ellaudet(a)fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi all,
Below is our preliminary abstract. We were not sure how to refer to the
article/authors in the subheading. We welcome comments and criticism.
Thanks,
Elena & Omar
################
It?s Not About Race:
Confirming Fryer and Levitt's Understanding of the Black-White Test Score Gap
Upon School Entry
Although more than half a century has passed since the landmark Brown v. Board
of Ed. decision, black children continue to lag academically behind their white
peers. For decades, research comparing the test scores of black and white
students has consistently found a substantial gap, even among four-year olds.
Fryer and Levitt (2004), using a new nationally representative data set, found
that the test score disparity among Kindergarteners almost entirely disappears
after controlling for a small set of socio-economic, family and health related
characteristics. If robust, this exceptional finding would suggest that
black-white differences in testing are neither innate nor insoluble. In this
article we demonstrate that the results are not sensitive to model
specification, different treatments of missing data, or weights. The gap
evident in later years is not present when children enter school.
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l(a)lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l