28 Apr
2010
28 Apr
'10
11:34 a.m.
Hey folks,
Just got some feedback from the Dataverse team that some of you are
releasing replication archives without completely cataloging what's going on
(e.g., no abstracts, etc.). So, just a friendly request to be comprehensive
in your cataloging. It helps the staff and it also helps future scholars
find your work down the road.
Maya
28 Apr
28 Apr
11:51 a.m.
Along these lines, I've just checked the status of submissions, and not too
many of you have submitted your replication archives. Be sure to give
yourselves enough time to do this, as you'll need to cite to this in your
replication paper!
Maya
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Maya Sen <msen at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hey folks,
Just got some feedback from the Dataverse team that some of you are
releasing replication archives without completely cataloging what's going on
(e.g., no abstracts, etc.). So, just a friendly request to be comprehensive
in your cataloging. It helps the staff and it also helps future scholars
find your work down the road.
Maya
11:56 a.m.
Hi Maya,
as a follow up to your last email, we were wondering if you could suggest us what is the
formal (or usual) way to cite/refer to dataverse in our paper.
Thank you.
Best,
Chiara
On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Maya Sen wrote:
Along these lines, I've just checked the status
of submissions, and not too many of you have submitted your replication archives. Be sure
to give yourselves enough time to do this, as you'll need to cite to this in your
replication paper!
Maya
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Maya Sen <msen at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hey folks,
Just got some feedback from the Dataverse team that some of you are releasing replication
archives without completely cataloging what's going on (e.g., no abstracts, etc.).
So, just a friendly request to be comprehensive in your cataloging. It helps the staff and
it also helps future scholars find your work down the road.
Maya
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l at lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
12:24 p.m.
Hi Chiara,
This might help answer your question: http://thedata.org/node/115
-Shelby
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Chiara Superti
<csuperti at fas.harvard.edu>wrote:
Hi Maya,
as a follow up to your last email, we were wondering if you could suggest
us what is the formal (or usual) way to cite/refer to dataverse in our
paper.
Thank you.
Best,
Chiara
On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Maya Sen wrote:
Along these lines, I've just checked the status of submissions, and not
too many of you have submitted your replication archives. Be sure to give
yourselves enough time to do this, as you'll need to cite to this in your
replication paper!
Maya
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Maya Sen <msen at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hey folks,
Just got some feedback from the Dataverse team that some of you are
releasing replication archives without completely cataloging what's going on
(e.g., no abstracts, etc.). So, just a friendly request to be comprehensive
in your cataloging. It helps the staff and it also helps future scholars
find your work down the road.
Maya
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l at lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l at lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
1:36 p.m.
More info can also be found here:
http://thedata.org/citation/standard
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Shelby Grossman
<shelbygrossman at gmail.com>wrote:
Hi Chiara,
This might help answer your question: http://thedata.org/node/115
-Shelby
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Chiara Superti <csuperti at fas.harvard.edu
wrote:
Hi Maya,
as a follow up to your last email, we were wondering if you could suggest
us what is the formal (or usual) way to cite/refer to dataverse in our
paper.
Thank you.
Best,
Chiara
On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Maya Sen wrote:
Along these lines, I've just checked the status of submissions, and not
too many of you have submitted your replication archives. Be sure to give
yourselves enough time to do this, as you'll need to cite to this in your
replication paper!
Maya
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Maya Sen <msen at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l at lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
Hey folks,
Just got some feedback from the Dataverse team that some of you are
releasing replication archives without completely cataloging what's going on
(e.g., no abstracts, etc.). So, just a friendly request to be comprehensive
in your cataloging. It helps the staff and it also helps future scholars
find your work down the road.
Maya
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l at lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
_______________________________________________
gov2001-l mailing list
gov2001-l at lists.fas.harvard.edu
http://lists.fas.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/gov2001-l
5122
days inactive
5122
days old
gov2001@lists.gking.harvard.edu
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
csuperti＠fas.harvard.edu -
msen＠fas.harvard.edu -
shelbygrossman＠gmail.com