Are you saying that you found evidence in support of Putnam's claim?
Quoting Abby Williamson <abby.williamson(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello all,
We?d appreciate your comments on our draft abstract. The title remains a
bit awkward, so any suggestions on that are particularly welcome.
Best,
Abby, Kira, and Anant
From ?Sing, Sing, Sing? to ?The Sound of Silence:?
Evidence that Generational Replacement is Shrinking Americans' Discussion
Networks
Kira Matus, Anant Thaker, Abigail Williamson
Abstract
Comparing Americans' discussion networks in 1985 and 2004, McPherson et. al.
(2006) find a substantial drop in the number of people adults talk to about
important matters. Over this period, the mean number of discussion partners
reported on the General Social Survey fell from three to two, while the mode
fell from three to zero. Since questions about discussion networks elicit
information about respondents? most intimate ties, this finding suggests
that Americans today have fewer sources of socio-emotional support. We
extend McPherson et. al.'s findings, using exact matching to demonstrate
that changes in the racial, educational, and income composition of the
population do not account for network shrinkage between 1985 and 2004.
Rather, we find evidence of Putnam's (2000) claim that generational
replacement is key in explaining shrinking social networks, as consecutively
less social cohorts replace the especially gregarious World War II
generation.