Dear Amelia Users and Developers,
I just started to use Amelia II to impute missing values a longitudinal
dataset. I have a specific question about that and would like to know if
you could help me to understand what is the correct way to impute the
data in my case. My data are really simple: units are individuals with
ID, gender, race, years of education, etc. and the income per hour for
every year between age 30 and age 50. I would like to impute the missing
values on the income per hour. I tried to impute the data already but it
seems that the imputed values do not take into consideration prior and
later observations. For example, if income at age 38 is missing, I would
like to impute a value based on the income at age 37 and age 39, which
is not the case for the moment.
On this topic, I also found this post on a blog:
http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/12873/multiple-imputation-for-miss…
but I am not sure if this correspond to my situation. The imputation I
made was with the format I had (one line - one unit: first line = ID 1,
income.age.30, income.age.31, ...; second line = ID 2, income.age.30,
income.age.31...). Attached to this email you will find an extract of
the data under this form. Based on this post, If I understood it
correctly, I have to create a times series variables and transpose the
same individual on different lines (e.g. first line = ID 1,
income.age.30, income.age.31; second line = ID 1, income.age.30,
income.age.31, ...). But I am not really sure about that.
I will be happy if you could give me an advice or if you could tell me
if the topic where already discussed in this mailing list.
Thank you very much!
Best wishes,
Francesco Giudici
--
Francesco Giudici
Postdoctoral Fellow
Teachers College, Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
fg2296(a)columbia.edu
--
Francesco Giudici
Postdoctoral Fellow
Teachers College, Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
fg2296(a)columbia.edu