Re: [amelia] question about "non-invertible" error

what you suggest would probably work, but i would first look at your data to see if you can find the collinearities. maybe you're including a variable that is nearly equal to another, or have a set of dummy variables without leaving out the constant term, etc. you could take one of the imputed data sets and run a correlation matrix to get a feel for things. If you have 2 highly collinear variables, then dropping one of the 2 will not cause you to lose much predictive power, so its a reasonable procedure. Gary http://gking.harvard.edu Donald Braman wrote: I'm attempting to use AmeliaII in the following way: vars_to_impute <- gundata[,c("progun", "egalitarianism", "individualism", "crfear", "victim", "female", "RACE", "income", "URBANKID", "URBANNOW", "RELIGION", "iss", "democrat", "conservative")] imputed <- amelia(data=vars_to_impute, p2s=2, noms=c("RACE","RELIGION", "URBANKID","URBANNOW"), outname="imputation", ords=c("democrat", "conservative") The problem that I run into is that in about half of the imputation attempts fail due to non-invertible covariance matrices. I'm curious if there is any way to deal with this aside from removing the most highly covariant variables? For example, given that it produces imputed data about 1/5 of the time, would it be acceptable to use successful imputations? E.g., can I just set m=100 and use as many imputations as I like from the resulting set of ~25 imputations? If I do need to remove the covariate variables, do you know of a simple way to check for that among a given set of variables?