Dear all,
I am using Amelia II to impute but I have a question regarding one of
my variables which seems to pose a problem for multiple imputation
unless I can find a better coding rule:
I want to control for **compliance with treatment*** (binary variable
1,0) but I am not sure how to deal with the following:
say patient1 is under T1 in 1990 and complies, then dummy for T1=1 and
dummy for compliance=1
say patient2 is under T1 in 1999 and does not comply, then dummy for
T1=1 and dummy for compliance=0
But, then, say patient1 is NOT under T1 in 1980 (T1=0)
what value should I assign to compliance in this case? Should I leave
it as a missing -no value- (it makes sense but I will lose many
observations). On the other hand, it doesnt' make sense to assign 1 or
0 to compliance if there was nothing to comply (or fail to comply)
with in the first place.
Moreover, if I leave the compliance value as missing in this case,
when I use Amelia II the missing value for compliance will be imputed
and I am not sure this would be correct given that in reality
compliance did not exist b/c there was no treatment to comply with.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Helen A. Brown
-
Amelia mailing list served by Harvard-MIT Data Center
[Un]Subscribe/View Archive:
http://lists.gking.harvard.edu/?info=amelia
More info about Amelia:
http://gking.harvard.edu/amelia