10 Jul
2007
10 Jul
'07
1:41 p.m.
that looks like our bug, but when there is 90% missing in a variable your
results will be quite model dependent. not much you can do when there is
no information of course. but maybe you can see whether there
is a way to fill in some of the cells and try again.
Gary
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Eric McGhee wrote:
My imputation gets very close to completion, and then
suddenly gives me the
following error message:
{Amelia Error Code: NA
c(1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102,
1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102,
1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102, 1102,
1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104,
1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104,
1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104, 1104,
1106, 1106, 1106, 1106, 1106, 1106, 1106, 1106, 1106, 1106, 1106, 1106, }
This basic pattern is then repeated dozens of times, with different numbers
following the "c(". I'm trying to impute a variable with over 90%
missing-could that be part of the problem?
Eric McGhee
Assistant Professor
Department of Political Science
1284 University of Oregon
1415 Kincaid Street
Eugene, OR 97403-1284
(541) 346-4861
-
Amelia mailing list served by Harvard-MIT Data Center
[Un]Subscribe/View Archive: http://lists.gking.harvard.edu/?info=amelia